In ordinary arithmetic and algebra, the commutative operations are **multiplication and addition**. The non-commutative operations are subtraction, division, and exponentiation.

Contents

- 1 What function operations are commutative?
- 2 Which of the four basic operations are commutative?
- 3 Are all four operations commutative?
- 4 Which operations are commutative and associative addition?
- 5 How do you know if an operation is commutative?
- 6 Are operators commutative?
- 7 What is commutative in maths?
- 8 Is division a commutative operation?
- 9 Is XOR commutative?
- 10 Is division associative or commutative?
- 11 Which of the following are commutative?
- 12 What is an associative operation?
- 13 What are commutative and associative properties?
- 14 Which is an example of associative property of addition?
- 15 Commutative Operations The order in which vectors are …
- 16 1.1: Binary operations
- 16.1 Properties:
- 16.1.1 Associativeproperty
- 16.1.2 Commutativeproperty
- 16.1.3 Example (PageIndex ): NOT Commutative
- 16.1.4 Example (PageIndex ): Commutative
- 16.1.5 Identity
- 16.1.6 Example (PageIndex ): Is identity unique?
- 16.1.7 Example (PageIndex ): Identity
- 16.1.8 Example (PageIndex ):
- 16.1.9 Distributive Property
- 16.1.10 Example (PageIndex ): Find ((26)(27))
- 16.1.11 Example (PageIndex ):
- 16.1.12 Example (PageIndex ):
- 16.1.13 Example (PageIndex ):
- 16.1.14 Summary

- 17 Mathwords: Commutative
- 18 Arithmetic operators (Maxima 5.45.0 Manual)

## What function operations are commutative?

What is Commutative Property? If changing the order of the numbers does not change the result in a certain mathematical expression, then the operation is commutative. Only addition and multiplication are commutative, while subtraction and division are noncommutative.

## Which of the four basic operations are commutative?

Addition and multiplication are commutative operations: 2+3=3+2=5.

## Are all four operations commutative?

Any operation ⊕ for which a⊕b = b⊕a for all values of a and b. Addition and multiplication are both commutative. Subtraction, division, and composition of functions are not. For example, 5 + 6 = 6 + 5 but 5 – 6 ≠ 6 – 5.

## Which operations are commutative and associative addition?

In math, the associative and commutative properties are laws applied to addition and multiplication that always exist. The associative property states that you can re-group numbers and you will get the same answer and the commutative property states that you can move numbers around and still arrive at the same answer.

## How do you know if an operation is commutative?

In math, an operation is commutative if the order of the numbers used can be altered with the result remaining the same. For example, addition and multiplication are commutative operations, as shown below.

## Are operators commutative?

Fundamental Properties of Operators The commutative law does not generally hold for operators. In general,but not always, ˆAˆB≠ˆBˆA. To help identify if the inequality in Equation 3.2.

## What is commutative in maths?

This law simply states that with addition and multiplication of numbers, you can change the order of the numbers in the problem and it will not affect the answer. Subtraction and division are NOT commutative.

## Is division a commutative operation?

Division is not commutative.

## Is XOR commutative?

Hence (S, XOR) is a group. In fact it is an Abelian group because we showed above that XOR is also commutative. Two groups are said to be isomorphic if there is a one-to-one mapping between the elements of the sets that preserves the operation.

## Is division associative or commutative?

Addition and multiplication are commutative. Subtraction and division are not commutative.

## Which of the following are commutative?

The word “commutative” comes from “commute” or “move around”, so the Commutative Property is the one that refers to moving stuff around. For addition, the rule is “a + b = b + a”; in numbers, this means 2 + 3 = 3 + 2. For multiplication, the rule is “ab = ba”; in numbers, this means 2×3 = 3×2.

## What is an associative operation?

1. In mathematics, an associative operation is a calculation that gives the same result regardless of the way the numbers are grouped. Addition and multiplication are both associative, while subtraction and division are not.

## What are commutative and associative properties?

The associative property of addition states that you can group the addends in different ways without changing the outcome. The commutative property of addition states that you can reorder the addends without changing the outcome.

## Which is an example of associative property of addition?

Associative property of addition: Changing the grouping of addends does not change the sum. For example, ( 2 + 3 ) + 4 = 2 + ( 3 + 4 ) (2 + 3) + 4 = 2 + (3 + 4) (2+3) +4=2+(3+4)left parenthesis, 2, plus, 3, right parenthesis, plus, 4, equals, 2, plus, left parenthesis, 3, plus, 4, right parenthesis.

## Commutative Operations The order in which vectors are …

Commutative Operations are operations that are mutually exclusive. It makes no difference whether vectors are inserted first or which ones are added last. It is believed by mathematicians that vector addition is commutative. Which of the following common arithmetic operations are commutative in nature? Which ones aren’t? Commutative Operations are operations that are mutually exclusive. It makes no difference whether vectors are inserted first or which ones are added last. It is believed by mathematicians that vector addition is commutative.

Which ones aren’t?

According to the problem’s structure, we have observed that the edition and multiplication are both members of the community of operations, which is correct.

It simply argues that we can perform two things in any sequence and have the same effect, thus it doesn’t really matter what order we do things in.

- In both circumstances, the correct answer is five digits.
- So, for example, they were asked if subtraction is a community of property, and we may answer this question by examining an example.
- So, for the time being, the answer to five minus one is, if the attraction was a community of property.
- We did, however, detect something.
- In light of the fact that altering the order alters the solution, always draw to numbers.
- Now, apart from that, he wonders if the split of non-zero real numbers is a community division.
- We divide numbers by, for example, one divided by two, as well as one divided by three.

As a result, we divide one by two to get half, which we then divide by three to get three.

We’re simply multiplying by one over three, which results in the number 16, and we can repeat this process in the opposite direction as well.

We’ll double the denominator by two, then we’ll add another 16 to the end.

Now suppose we performed it in the other order: 24 divided by four is equal to two; 24 divided by four equals six; 24 divided by four equals six In this case, three is the result of dividing by two.

So, after putting on your socks and shoes, you may start your day.

Consider this: we always put our socks on first because if we put her shoes on first, the socks would be at the bottom of the pile of things to choose from.

In other words, don’t think that putting on socks and shoes exemplifies the community of property since it does matter quite a deal.

Part of putting on a hat and a coat involves putting our socks and shoes on.

As a result, this is an example of a member of the community of property party washing and drying your laundry.

As a result, we have to wash our clothes before we can hang it to dry.

This is yet another example of a community of property that is not a community of property, and Pa Refugee had requested us to give him some instances of pairs of activities that are and are not communal.

I could provide a few of instances that I have come up with on my own, such as eating a burger and then eating your french fries, which would be considered a pair of community of acts.

Some individuals prefer to eat their burger first, which is understandable.

Additionally, opening a book and reading it might be considered non-community acts, because you can’t read your book unless you first open it.

In order to avoid getting all what?

Consequently, opening your umbrella at that point would be a waste of time, and therein is our answer to the problem.

We have a vector A, a vector B, and a doctor on hand.

We’ll assume that Victor has an inflated ego.

In the case of vector b, it would be I had plus two j’s plus a que hat, while in the case of vector see, it would be I had plus J’s plus to K’s hat.

In order to understand that vector a plus vector B plus factor see are equivalent, we must first understand that vector a plus is the offspring of Dr B and C.

In addition, because of the inclusion of common property, everything will remain the same.

Vector a plus vector B plus vector C would always be equal to one another in terms of magnitude.

Whatever happened, I was going to have a plus forge hat plus four K hat no matter what, since this is effectively saying, let’s just suppose we have Constance or Scaler numbers.

Adding vector amounts is precisely the same as adding scaler quantities, because vector quantities are merely the components of a scaler quantity.

The commonality of property of addition applies after you have, hmm, broken down a vector into its constituent parts, whether they are in two dimensions or three dimensions, regardless of how you add them together.

That marks the conclusion of the solution.

To begin, let us suppose that we have an equal to two and that it is simple to multiply by three to determine whether or not a certain action has been done.

B two B minus an is a mathematical expression.

Is that the same as three minus two or less?

And here we have one of thes who is not equal to the others.

We also have his division by a roll number community that is not zero in Part B of the equation.

Is it possible to have a B that is able to be over a We had roughly 20 of us, and three is equivalent to three and two-thirds, otherwise that is surely not true.

I haven’t done so for a gathering when everyone is putting on their socks and addressing concerns in the community.

Putting on your shoe and then putting on your socks over your shoes, is it the same thing?

As a result, these two are not synonymous.

So, let’s pretend we have a person here, and the communities are putting on their coats.

It is inevitable that the same result will be achieved.

Okay.

As a result, we are questioned if doing the laundry and loving it constitutes community.

After that, our clothing are soaked.

However, if we put our dry clothes in first, they will remain dry, and then we will put them in our washer, where they will remain wet until our Washington pulls them out, which will result in us having wet clothing.

It is not the case in this instance that it is a community.

As a result, for a community of “we are us,” subtraction is necessary.

As a result, subtraction does not commute to tip.

For example, we know that if the division of non-zero integers is committed tiff well and that, for example, the state of Iowa, I pick equal to five and five divide.

In this way, we know that denigration of non-you’re really numbers is not something that can be tolerated.

So, first and foremost, Seaney, we are who we are.

Now, this is no longer the case since you must put on your socks before your shoes or you will get a D.

However, we are aware that this is the case right now because you need to wash your laundry before you can dry it. So those are the responses.

## 1.1: Binary operations

Allow us to consider a non-empty set S, and consider a binary operation on S to be defined as follows: If (a b) is defined for all members of S, then the operation is said to be binary on S. (a,b in S). In other words, (star) is a rule that may be applied to any two items in the set (S).

#### Example (PageIndex ): Binary operations

The following are binary operations on (mathbb) that can be performed:

- The mathematical operations of addition (+), subtraction (-), multiplication (times ), and division (div) are all represented as symbols. Define an operation oplus on (mathbb) by (a oplus b =ab+a+b, b for all a,b in mathbb)
- Define an operation ominus on (mathbb) by (a ominus b =ab+a-b, b for all a,b in mathbb)
- Define an operation oplus on (mathbb) by (a ominus b =ab+a-b Make a definition for an operation otimes on (mathbb ) by (a otimes b =(a+b)(a+b), and apply it to all a,b in mathbb )
- Define an operation oslash on (mathbb ) by (a oslash b =(a+b)(a-b), forall a,b inmathbb )
- Define an operation min on (mathbb ) by (a vee b =min, forall a,b inmathbb )
- Define an operation max

These are the arithmetic operations: addition (+), subtraction (-), multiplication (times a number), and division (div a number). Defining an operation oplus on (mathbb ) as (a oplus b = ab+a+b, an ominus b = ab+a-b, an ominus b for all a, b in mathbb); defining an operation ominus on (mathcc) as (a ominus b = ab+a-b, an ominus b for all Make a definition for an operation otimes on (mathbb ) by (a otimes b =(a+b)(a+b), then apply it to all a,b in mathbb ; Define an operation oslash on (mathbb ) by (a oslash b =(a+b)(a-b), forall a,b inmathbb ); Define an operation min on (mathbb ) by (a vee b =min, forall a,b inmathbb ); Define an operation max on

- 2oplus 3 = (2)(3)+2+3=11
- 2otimes 3 = (2+3)(2+3)=25
- 2oslash 3 = (2+3)(2-3)=-5
- 2ominus 3 = (2)(3)+2-3=5
- 2ovee 3 = 2
- 2owedge 3 = 3
- 2oplus 3 = 2
- 3otimes 3 = 2
- 3otimes 3 = 2+3
- 3otimes 3 = 3
- 3otimes 3 =

Take part in an exercise program (PageIndex )

- (-2 oplus 3)
- (-2 otimes 3)
- (-2 oslash 3)
- (-2 ominus 3)
- (-2 ovee 3)
- (-2 owedge 3)
- (-2 oplus 3)
- (-2 o

Answers: 5, 1, 5, 2, and 3

### Properties:

5, 1, 5, 2, 3 are the correct answers.

##### Example (PageIndex ): Closed binary operations

The following are examples of closed binary operations on the symbol (mathbb ).

- The operations of addition (+), subtraction (-), and multiplication (times a number of times)
- In arithmetic, define an operation oplus on (mathbb) as (a oplus b = ab + a+b, where a,b are all in arithmetic in mathbb)
- Declare that an operation ominus is performed on (mathbb) using the formula (a minus b = ab + ab-b, for every a,b ) in (mathbb)
- Make a definition for an operation otimes on (mathbb ) by (a otimes b =(a+b)(a+b), and apply it to all a,b in mathbb )
- In (mathbb ), define an operation oslash on it by (a oslash b =(a+b)(a-b), for every a,b in (mathbb)
- Then, define the min operation on the data structure (mathbb) using the formula (a vee min =min, for all values of a and b in the data structure)
- Create an operation max on (mathbb) by (a wedge b = max b, a+b-3 in all of the variables a, b in mathbb)
- Create an operation defect on (mathbb) by (a ast 3 b = a+b-3 in all of the variables a, b in mathematics
- And Create an operation max on (mathbb) by (a ast 3 b = max b,

Take part in an exercise program (PageIndex ) How can I tell whether or not the ominus operation on (mathbb) has been completed? Answer The operation ominus on the variable (mathbb) has been completed.

##### Example (PageIndex ): Counter Example

Division ((div )) is not a closed binary operation on (mathbb ).(2, 3 in mathbb ) yet it is a closed binary operation on (mathbb ). (fracnotin mathbb).

##### Summary of arithmetic operations and corresponding sets:

(+) | (times) | (-) | (div) | |

(mathbb ) | closed | closed | not closed | not closed |

(mathbb ) | closed | closed | closed | not closed |

(mathbb ) | closed | closed | closed | closed (only when (0) is not included) |

(mathbb ) | closed | closed | closed | closed (only when (0) is not included) |

#### Associativeproperty

It is not a closed binary operation on (mathbb) to divide by three, although it is on (mathbb) to divide by two. (2, 3 in mathbb) (fracnotin mathbb).

##### Example (PageIndex ): Associative

Determine whether or not the binary operation oplus is associative on the variable n. (mathbb ). We will demonstrate that the binary operation oplus is associative on the integer n. (mathbb ). Proof: Allow me to express myself (a,b,c in mathbb ). Consider the following: ((a oplus b) oplus c = (ab+a+b) oplus c = (ab+a+b) oplus c = (ab+a+b)c+(ab+b)+c= (ab)c+ac+bc+ab+a+b+c= (ab)c+ac+bc+ab+a+b+c). On the other hand, (a oplus (b oplus c)=a oplus (bc+b+c)=a oplus (bc+b+c)=a(bc+b+c)+a+(bc+b+c)=a(bc)+ab+ac+a+bc+b+c)=a(bc)+ab+ac+a+bc+b+c)=a(b Due to the fact that multiplication is associative on (mathbb ), ((a oplus b) oplus c =a oplus (b oplus c) ) is equivalent to an oplus (b oplus c).

(mathbb ).

##### Example (PageIndex ): Not Associative

Determining whether or not the binary operation of subtraction ((-)) is associative on the variable (mathbb ). As a result, the binary operation subtraction ((-)) is not associative on the value (mathbb ).

Counter-Example: If you choose (a=2,b=3, c=4,) you will get ((2-3)-4=-1-4=-5 ), but if you choose ((2-(3-4)=2-(-1)=2+1=3 ), you will get ((2-(3-4)=2-(-1)=2+1=3 ). As a result, the binary operation subtraction ((-)) is not associative on the integer n. (mathbb ).

#### Commutativeproperty

Commutativeproperty is defined as follows: Assume that (S) is a non-empty set. In the case of a binary operation (star) on the number (S), it is said to be commutative if the result of the operation (a star b) is the same as the result of the operation (a star b). For the sake of simplicity, we will assume that the addition ((+)) and multiplication ((times )) are commutative on (mathbb ). (You are under no need to prove them!). The following is a demonstration of the fact that subtraction ((-)) is not commutative.

#### Example (PageIndex ): NOT Commutative

Commutative property is defined as follows: Assume that (S) is a non-empty collection of variables. Commmutative operations on the set S are those in which the binary operation (star) on the set S is equal to the binary operation (star) on all of the elements of the set S (i.e. For the sake of simplicity, we will assume that the addition ((+)) and multiplication ((times )) are commutative on 1. (mathbb ). If you believe them, you are not required to prove them! The following is a demonstration of the non-commutative nature of subtraction ((-)).

#### Example (PageIndex ): Commutative

Check to see if the binary operation oplus is commutative on the variable (mathbb ). We will demonstrate that the binary operation oplus is commutative on the integer n. (mathbb ). Proof: Allow me to express myself (a,b in mathbb ). Then analyze the expression ((a oplus b) Equals (ab+a+b)). To the contrary, the expression ((b plus a) Equals ba +b +a. ) is true. The fact that multiplication is associative on (mathbb ) means that ((a oplus b) = (b oplus a. ) is true. As a result, the binary operation oplus is commutative on the integer n.

(Box)

#### Identity

Identity is defined as follows: A non-empty set (S) with binary operation (star ), is said to have an identity (e in S), if and only if (e star a=a, e=a, e=a, e=a, e=a, e=a, e=a, e=a, e=a, e=a, e=a, e=a, e= Remember that 0 is known as additive identity on the matrix (((mathbb, +)) and 1 is known as multiplicative identity on the matrix (((mathbb, times)) (see below).

#### Example (PageIndex ): Is identity unique?

For simplicity, consider the set (S) to be a non-empty set and the operation on it to be a binary operation on it (S). If (e 1) and (e 2) are two identities in ((S,star) ), then if (e 1=e 2) is true, then (e 1=e 2). Proof: Assume that e 1 and e 2 are two identities in ((S,star)) and that e 1 and e 2 are two identities in ((S,star)). Then (e 1=e 1 e 2=e 2 e 3=e 3 e 4=e 4) As a result, each individual is distinct. (Box)

#### Example (PageIndex ): Identity

Is there a unique identifier for ((mathbb, oplus))? Answer In this case, let (e) be the identity on (((mathbb, oplus)). Once again in mathbb, (e + A=a+E+A) is equivalent to ((e + A=a, for all an in mathbb.) Consequently, ea=0 and e(a+1)=0 are both true for all an in mathbb, and hence e=0.

Since ea+e=0 is true for all an in mathbb, and e(a+1)=0 is true for all an in mathbb, e=0 is true for all an in mathbb. Now, (0 oplus a=aoplus 0=a, aoplus 0=a, aoplus 0=a, aoplus 0=a, aoplus 0=a, aoplus 0=a, aoplus 0=a, in mathbb.) As a result, the identity on (((mathbb, oplus)) is 0).

#### Example (PageIndex ):

Is ((mathbb, otimes)) a real person or a fictitious name? Answer In this case, let e be the identity on (((mathbb, otimes))). Then (e otimes a=a otimes e=a, an otimes e=a, an otimes e=a, an otimes e=a, an otimes e=a, an otimes e=a, an otimes e=a in mathbb.) In this way, ((e+a)(e+a)=(a+e)(a+e) =a, a for any an in mathBB,) is true. Now, ((a+e)(a+e) =a, for all an in mathbb.)(implies a2+2ea+e2=a, for all an in mathbb.)(implies a2+2ea+e2=a, for all an in mathbb.) Choose (a=0) first, followed by (e=0).

As a result, the expression (((mathbb, otimes)) has no identity.

#### Distributive Property

Distributive property is defined as follows: Assume that (S) is a non-empty set. Assume that (star 1) and (star 2) are two separate binary operations on (star 1) (S). Then if (a a star 1 (b a star 2 c)= (a a star 1 b) a star 2 (a a star 1 c), a star 1 (b a star 2 c), a star 1 (b a star 2 c), a star 1 (b a star 2 c), a star 1 (b a star 2 c), a star 1 ( It is important to note that the multiplication spreads over the addition on (mathbb.) As a result, the equation is (4(10+6)=(4)(10)+(4)(6)=40+24=64).

F-FirstO-OuterI-InnerL-Last This characteristic is quite beneficial when attempting to locate (((26)(27)) as demonstrated below:

#### Example (PageIndex ): Find ((26)(27))

As a result, ((26)(27) =400+120+140+42=702;)). Let’s get this party started!

#### Example (PageIndex ):

So (26+27=400+120+140+42=702=702) is a valid expression. Play a game, shall we?

#### Example (PageIndex ):

Is division preferable than addition in terms of distribution? Example of an AnswerCounter: Select the values a = 2, b = 3, and c = 4. Then a (div )(b + c) = 2 (div)(3+4) = 2 a (div )(b + c) (div) 7.= (frac). and (a (div) b) + (a (div) c) = (a (div) d) + (a (div) e) = (a frac) + (a frac) (frac). = = (frac). Because (frac) (frac), the binary operation (div) is not distributive over + because frac frac frac.

#### Example (PageIndex ):

Is there a distribution of otimes across oplus on oplus on otimes on oplus on otimes? Example of an AnswerCounter: Select the values a = 2, b = 3, and c = 4. Then 2(otimes )(3(oplus )4) = 2(otimes )= 2(otimes )19= (2+19)(2+19)= 441 and (2(otimes )3)(oplus )(2(otimes )4)= (oplus )= 25(oplus )36= (25)(36)+25+36= 961 and (2(otimes )3)(oplus )(2 Given that 441 961, the binary operation otimes is not distributive over oplus on otimes (because 441 = 961). (mathbb ).

#### Summary

For a non-empty set (S), we have acquired the following information in this section:

- Associative property
- Commutative property
- Distribution property
- And Identity are some of the terms used in binary operations in mathematics.

## Mathwords: Commutative

Commutative Operation Any operation⊕for whicha⊕b=b⊕afor all values ofaandb. Addition and multiplication are both commutative. Subtraction,division, andcompositionoffunctionsare not. For example, 5 + 6 = 6 + 5but5 – 6 ≠ 6 – 5. More: Commutativity isn’t just a property of an operation alone. It’s actually a property of an operation over a particularset. For example, when we say addition is commutative over the set ofreal numbers, we mean thata + b = b + afor all real numbersaandb. Subtraction is not commutative over real numbers since we can’t say thata–b = b–afor all real numbersaandb. Even thougha–b = b–awhenever aandbare the same, that still doesn’t make subtraction commutative over the set of all real numbers.Further examples: In this more formal sense, it is correct to say thatmatrix multiplicationis not commutative forsquare matrices. Even thoughAB = BAfor some square matrices A and B, commutativity does not hold for all square matrices. It is also correct to saycompositionis not commutative forfunctions, even thoughone-to-one functionscommute with theirinverses.See also Associative |

## Arithmetic operators (Maxima 5.45.0 Manual)

The addition, multiplication, division, and exponentiation symbols+*/and represent the operations of addition, multiplication, division, and exponentiation. Those who are unfamiliar with the names of these operators are advised to look up “+””*””/”and””, which may appear in places where the name of a function or operator is necessary. Adding and subtracting using the symbols+and-represents unary addition and negation, respectively; the names of these operators are”+”and”-,” respectively. In Maxima, the subtractiona – bis is represented as the additiona + bis (- b).

- Unlike the binary subtraction operator, Maxima recognizes”-“only as the name of the unary negation operator, not as the name of the binary subtraction operator.
- For example, division is provided for expressions likea * b(- 1) As the name of the division operator, “/” is recognized by Maxima as such.
- Division and exponentiation are binary, noncommutative operations that can be used together or separately.
- When it comes to internal storage, orderlessp is in charge of determining the ordering.
- Arithmetic computations are performed on literal numbers, not on decimal numbers (integers, rationals, ordinary floats, and bigfloats).
- If either operand is an ordinary float or bigfloat, or if the result is an exact integer or rational, exponentiation is simplified to a number; otherwise, an exponentiation may be simplified tosqrtor another exponentiation or left untouched.
- Floating-point contagion does not apply to arithmetic computations.
- Consequently, arithmetic is performed using the aforementioned (but simplified) formulas.
- Whenever one operand is a list or a matrix and the other operand is an operand of a different type, the other operand is merged with each element of the list or matrix in the first operand.
- Maxima arranges the operands in a canonical form, which it then displays.
- ( percent o6) 144 pieces of ax Division and exponentiation are binary, noncommutative operations that can be used together or separately.

(percent i1); ab (percent o1) b (percent i2); (percent o2),]] (percent i3)), apply (“”,)]; ab (percent i1); ab (percent o1) b (percent i2); (percent o2),]] (percent i3), apply (“”,)]; ab (percent i1); ab (percent o1) b (percent I ( percent o3) bSubtraction and division are internally expressed in terms of addition and multiplication, respectively, to avoid confusion.

The concept of floating-point contagion is used.

(percent i1) simp: false; (percent o1)false (percent i2) ‘(17 + 29*11/7 – 53)’; 29 113 (percent i1) simp: false; (percent o1)false (percent i2) ( percent o2) 437 (percent o4) – – 7 (percent i3) simp: true; (percent o3)true (percent i4) ‘(17 + 29*11/7 – 53)’; 437 (percent o4)— 7 (percent i3) For lists (depending onlistarith) and matrices, arithmetic is performed element-by-element, as is the case with other data types.

(percent i1) matrix (,) – matrix (,); (percent o1)(percent i2) 5 * matrix (,); (percent o2) 5 * matrix (,); (percent o2) 5 * matrix (,); ( percent i3) listsrith: (percent o3)false (percent i4)/;(percent o4)-(percent i5)(percent i5); listrith: false; listrith (percent o3)false (percent i4)false ( percent i6) listarithm: true; (percent o6)true (percent i7)/; cmt (percent o7) 729 (percent i8)x; xxxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ( percent o8)